Publications by Author: Adam J Granger

T

Tritsch, Nicolas X, Adam J Granger, and Bernardo L Sabatini. (2016) 2016. “Mechanisms and Functions of GABA Co-Release.”. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 17 (3): 139-45. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2015.21.

The 'one neuron, one neurotransmitter' doctrine states that synaptic communication between two neurons occurs through the release of a single chemical transmitter. However, recent findings suggest that neurons that communicate using more than one classical neurotransmitter are prevalent throughout the adult mammalian CNS. In particular, several populations of neurons previously thought to release only glutamate, acetylcholine, dopamine or histamine also release the major inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA. Here, we review these findings and discuss the implications of GABA co-release for synaptic transmission and plasticity.

See also: Reviews

S

Saunders, Arpiar, Adam J Granger, and Bernardo L Sabatini. (2015) 2015. “Corelease of Acetylcholine and GABA from Cholinergic Forebrain Neurons.”. ELife 4. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06412.

Neurotransmitter corelease is emerging as a common theme of central neuromodulatory systems. Though corelease of glutamate or GABA with acetylcholine has been reported within the cholinergic system, the full extent is unknown. To explore synaptic signaling of cholinergic forebrain neurons, we activated choline acetyltransferase expressing neurons using channelrhodopsin while recording post-synaptic currents (PSCs) in layer 1 interneurons. Surprisingly, we observed PSCs mediated by GABAA receptors in addition to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Based on PSC latency and pharmacological sensitivity, our results suggest monosynaptic release of both GABA and ACh. Anatomical analysis showed that forebrain cholinergic neurons express the GABA synthetic enzyme Gad2 and the vesicular GABA transporter (Slc32a1). We confirmed the direct release of GABA by knocking out Slc32a1 from cholinergic neurons. Our results identify GABA as an overlooked fast neurotransmitter utilized throughout the forebrain cholinergic system. GABA/ACh corelease may have major implications for modulation of cortical function by cholinergic neurons.

See also: Select Publication
Straub, Christoph, Adam J Granger, Jessica L Saulnier, and Bernardo L Sabatini. (2014) 2014. “CRISPR/Cas9-Mediated Gene Knock-down in Post-Mitotic Neurons.”. PloS One 9 (8): e105584. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105584.

The prokaryotic adaptive immune system CRISPR/Cas9 has recently been adapted for genome editing in eukaryotic cells. This technique allows for sequence-specific induction of double-strand breaks in genomic DNA of individual cells, effectively resulting in knock-out of targeted genes. It thus promises to be an ideal candidate for application in neuroscience where constitutive genetic modifications are frequently either lethal or ineffective due to adaptive changes of the brain. Here we use CRISPR/Cas9 to knock-out Grin1, the gene encoding the obligatory NMDA receptor subunit protein GluN1, in a sparse population of mouse pyramidal neurons. Within this genetically mosaic tissue, manipulated cells lack synaptic current mediated by NMDA-type glutamate receptors consistent with complete knock-out of the targeted gene. Our results show the first proof-of-principle demonstration of CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-down in neurons in vivo, where it can be a useful tool to study the function of specific proteins in neuronal circuits.

See also: Select Publication

L

Lovero, Kathryn L, Yuko Fukata, Adam J Granger, Masaki Fukata, and Roger A Nicoll. (2015) 2015. “The LGI1-ADAM22 Protein Complex Directs Synapse Maturation through Regulation of PSD-95 Function.”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 112 (30): E4129-37. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511910112.

Synapse development is coordinated by a number of transmembrane and secreted proteins that come together to form synaptic organizing complexes. Whereas a variety of synaptogenic proteins have been characterized, much less is understood about the molecular networks that support the maintenance and functional maturation of nascent synapses. Here, we demonstrate that leucine-rich, glioma-inactivated protein 1 (LGI1), a secreted protein previously shown to modulate synaptic AMPA receptors, is a paracrine signal released from pre- and postsynaptic neurons that acts specifically through a disintegrin and metalloproteinase protein 22 (ADAM22) to set postsynaptic strength. We go on to describe a novel role for ADAM22 in maintaining excitatory synapses through PSD-95/Dlg1/zo-1 (PDZ) domain interactions. Finally, we show that in the absence of LGI1, the mature synapse scaffolding protein PSD-95, but not the immature synapse scaffolding protein SAP102, is unable to modulate synaptic transmission. These results indicate that LGI1 and ADAM22 form an essential synaptic organizing complex that coordinates the maturation of excitatory synapses by regulating the functional incorporation of PSD-95.

See also: Collaborations
Lu, Wei, John A Gray, Adam J Granger, Matthew J During, and Roger A Nicoll. (2011) 2011. “Potentiation of Synaptic AMPA Receptors Induced by the Deletion of NMDA Receptors Requires the GluA2 Subunit.”. Journal of Neurophysiology 105 (2): 923-8. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00725.2010.

Deletion of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) early in development results in an increase in the number of synaptic AMPA receptors (AMPARs), suggesting a role for NMDARs in negatively regulating AMPAR trafficking at developing synapses. Substantial evidence has shown that AMPAR subunits function differentially in AMPAR trafficking. However, the role of AMPAR subunits in the enhancement of AMPARs following NMDAR ablation remains unknown. We have now performed single-cell genetic deletions in double-floxed mice in which the deletion of GluN1 is combined with the deletion of GluA1 or GluA2. We find that the AMPAR enhancement following NMDAR deletion requires the GluA2 subunit, but not the GluA1 subunit, indicating a key role for GluA2 in the regulation of AMPAR trafficking in developing synapses.

See also: Select Publication

G

Granger, Adam J, Wengang Wang, Keiramarie Robertson, Mahmoud El-Rifai, Andrea F Zanello, Karina Bistrong, Arpiar Saunders, et al. (2020) 2020. “Cortical ChAT+ Neurons Co-Transmit Acetylcholine and GABA in a Target- and Brain-Region-Specific Manner.”. ELife 9. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.57749.

The mouse cerebral cortex contains neurons that express choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) and are a potential local source of acetylcholine. However, the neurotransmitters released by cortical ChAT+ neurons and their synaptic connectivity are unknown. We show that the nearly all cortical ChAT+ neurons in mice are specialized VIP+ interneurons that release GABA strongly onto other inhibitory interneurons and acetylcholine sparsely onto layer 1 interneurons and other VIP+/ChAT+ interneurons. This differential transmission of ACh and GABA based on the postsynaptic target neuron is reflected in VIP+/ChAT+ interneuron pre-synaptic terminals, as quantitative molecular analysis shows that only a subset of these are specialized to release acetylcholine. In addition, we identify a separate, sparse population of non-VIP ChAT+ neurons in the medial prefrontal cortex with a distinct developmental origin that robustly release acetylcholine in layer 1. These results demonstrate both cortex-region heterogeneity in cortical ChAT+ interneurons and target-specific co-release of acetylcholine and GABA.

See also: Select Publication
Granger, Adam J, Michael L Wallace, and Bernardo L Sabatini. (2017) 2017. “Multi-Transmitter Neurons in the Mammalian Central Nervous System.”. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 45: 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conb.2017.04.007.

It is firmly established that many mammalian neurons release various combinations of amino acids, their derivatives, and other small molecules from presynaptic terminals in order to signal to their postsynaptic targets. Here we discuss recent findings about four types of multi-transmitter neurons-those that release GABA and acetylcholine (Ach); dopamine (DA) and GABA or glutamate; and glutamate and GABA. The mechanisms of co-release in each class differ and highlight the complex and dynamic nature of neurotransmitter release. Furthermore, identifying the neurotransmitter signature of each neuron and the post-synaptic targets of each neurotransmitter remain challenging. The existence of multi-transmitter neurons complicates the interpretation of connectomic wiring diagrams and poses interesting challenges for our understanding of circuit function in the brain.

See also: Reviews
Granger, Adam J, Nicole Mulder, Arpiar Saunders, and Bernardo L Sabatini. (2016) 2016. “Cotransmission of Acetylcholine and GABA.”. Neuropharmacology 100: 40-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2015.07.031.

Neurons that produce acetylcholine (ACh) are positioned to broadly influence the brain, with axonal arborizations that extend throughout the cerebral cortex, striatum, and hippocampus. While the action of these neurons has typically been attributed entirely to ACh, neurons often release more than one primary neurotransmitter. Here, we review evidence for the cotransmission of the inhibitory neurotransmitter GABA from cholinergic neurons throughout the mammalian central nervous system. Functional cotransmission of ACh and GABA has been reported in the retina and cortex, and anatomical studies suggest that GABA cotransmission is a common feature of nearly all forebrain ACh-producing neurons. Further experiments are necessary to confirm the extent of GABA cotransmission from cholinergic neurons, and the contribution of GABA needs to be considered when studying the functional impact of activity in ACh-producing neurons. This article is part of the Special Issue entitled 'Synaptopathy–from Biology to Therapy'.

See also: Reviews
Granger, Adam J, and Roger A Nicoll. (2014) 2014. “LTD Expression Is Independent of Glutamate Receptor Subtype.”. Frontiers in Synaptic Neuroscience 6: 15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsyn.2014.00015.

Long-term depression (LTD) is a form of synaptic plasticity that plays a major role in the activity-dependent reshaping of synaptic transmission. LTD is expressed as a decrease in synaptic AMPA receptor number, though the exact mechanism remains controversial. Several lines of evidence have suggested necessary roles for both the GluA1 and GluA2 subunits, and specifically certain interactions with their cytoplasmic tails. However, it is unclear if either GluA1 or GluA2 are absolutely required for LTD. We tested this hypothesis using constitutive knock-outs and single-cell molecular replacement of AMPA receptor subunits in mouse hippocampus. We found that neither GluA1 or GluA2 are required for normal expression of LTD, and indeed a normal decrease in synaptic transmission was observed in cells in which all endogenous AMPA receptors have been replaced by kainate receptors. Thus, LTD does not require removal of specific AMPA receptor subunits, but likely involves a more general modification of the synapse and its ability to anchor a broad range of receptor proteins.

See also: Select Publication
Granger, Adam J, and Roger A Nicoll. (2014) 2014. “Expression Mechanisms Underlying Long-Term Potentiation: A Postsynaptic View, 10 Years On.”. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 369 (1633): 20130136. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0136.

This review focuses on the research that has occurred over the past decade which has solidified a postsynaptic expression mechanism for long-term potentiation (LTP). However, experiments that have suggested a presynaptic component are also summarized. It is argued that the pairing of glutamate uncaging onto single spines with postsynaptic depolarization provides the final and most elegant demonstration of a postsynaptic expression mechanism for NMDA receptor-dependent LTP. The fact that the magnitude of this LTP is similar to that evoked by pairing synaptic stimulation and depolarization leaves little room for a substantial presynaptic component. Finally, recent data also require a revision in our thinking about the way AMPA receptors (AMPARs) are recruited to the postsynaptic density during LTP. This recruitment is independent of subunit type, but does require an adequate reserve pool of extrasynaptic receptors.

See also: Reviews